The Leaders and Laggards of Sustainability Goals

December 19, 2014

Imagine that you arrive to take your first flying lesson. The instructing pilot asks, “How much fuel do you guess we should put in the tank?” You think: “Guess? Come again? Shouldn’t we calculate the distance between where we are and where we are going, and then determine the fuel needed (and add in some extra fuel for peace of mind)?”
 
Yes. And the same is true for sustainability goals.
 
For the great majority of the Fortune Global 200, sustainability goals appear to be based on incremental improvements and/or what the company thinks it can easily do, rather than where the company needs to go.
 
Sustainability goals must be based on the gap between the starting point and the destination and identified by the leading science or ethics relevant to the goal, such as IPCC goals for GHG reductions, or management diversity goals based on gender percentages in the population.
 
Over the past two-plus years, Pivot Goals, a Winston Eco-Strategies initiative, has researched, analyzed and posted the Fortune Global 500’s publicly available environmental, social and, governance goals.
 
The results? The Fortune Global 500 companies are falling short of what is needed to achieve sustainability. But there is some light on the horizon.
 
As of late September 2014, results from Pivot Goals show that of the Fortune Global 200, only 150 (75%) have sustainability goals. On average, those 150 companies have 13 sustainability goals each. Not all of these sustainability goals fit into categories that have a science or ethics basis. Of the 1,621 goals in eligible categories, only 212 of the goals are science or ethics-based. This equates to only 13%. Moreover, only 1% of the eligible 1,621 goals are science-explicit, meaning that they contain specific references to leading science.

But the good news is that 50 of the Fortune Global 200 companies have a science-equivalent carbon reduction goal. In other words, on the most important goal – mitigating climate change -- a good chunk of the world’s largest companies are leading the way.
 
Eight companies stand out as the only ones with a goal to reach 100% renewable energy. These companies include: Walmart, Apple, BMW, Nestle, P&G, Unilever, Intel, Suisse Re, and Commerzbank. Of their goals, only one covers the entire company and has a due date. It is Commerzbank’s goal to "Purchase 100% green electricity from four new hydropower plants in Norway from 2013 to 2015."
 
Other companies phrase their carbon goals differently, such as being “net zero carbon.” Tesco plans to be a zero carbon business by 2050. By 2020, Unilever has set a goal of halving the GHG impact of its products, and by that same year, Volkswagen plans to reduce GHGs in the supply of energy to production facilities in Germany by 40%. And Microsoft has already reached its goal of becoming carbon neutral for data centers, software development labs, offices and employee air travel.
 
Unilever tops all companies in the Fortune Global 200 with 20 science-based goals, followed by Nestle with 9, Maersk and Panasonic with 8 each, and P&G and Woolworth’s with 7 each.
 
But outside of renewables and carbon emissions reductions, for the other 27 “Focus Areas” presented at PivotGoals.com, the gap between the threshold of sustainability and where we are today is strikingly wide.
 
The companies with no science or ethics-based goals are too long to list. To find them, visit PivotGoals.com and search by focus areas or categories of goals, value chain stage (supply chain, operations, product usage, end of life), macro-industry (such as commodities), micro-industry (such as metals), company name, goal type (such as specific & dated), absolute versus intensity, and keyword search.
 
As of now, it is easy to spot the leaders in sustainability goal setting because there are so few. But their numbers are growing. As aggressive goal-setting based in science and transparent reporting continues to proves its worth, we’ll likely see more companies stopping guessing and start utilizing science to set sustainability goals.

 

COMMENTS

 

No Comments Yet, Add Yours!

 

Recent Blog Posts

Hawaii's Recent Leap of Faith

  At the southernmost point of the United States, a 20 something named Alex stands atop a 30 foot cliff of hardened lava. The Pacific Ocean slaps below against the black rock, as the young...

[+] More

 

SustyBiz15 and the Progression of Sustainability

  GreenBiz and other sustainability voices assert that corporate sustainability is moving into its second decade as a movement. Since the launch of other highly publicized,...

[+] More

 

There's More Than One Zero

In the ever-evolving nomenclature of sustainability, the concept of “zero waste” is an especially tricky subject, one whose definition varies significantly depending on what company you...

[+] More

 

The ABCs (and Fs) of Sustainability Reporting

Sustainability Reporting has gone through several waves of evolution over the past decade.  As I presented at the 2012 MAPI conference and the 2013 Sustainable Brands New Metrics conference,...

[+] More

 

Trash as Treasure: From Setting to Surpassing the Bar on Waste Reduction

Whether a sustainability expert or newcomer, those who work in this industry likely will tell you that ‘sustainability’ can be an elusive, rarely agreed-upon and often poorly defined...

[+] More

 

March Madness: The Champions of Corporate Sustainability

March is here, and that means one thing to me -- March Madness!  For all its warts and shortcomings, the NCAA knows how to host a basketball championship. This tournament is so good that...

[+] More

 

The Top Ten Top 10s

As the "old year" drew to a close and the new year approached, my inbox was deluged by dozens of sustainability "Top 10" lists. Some were of the year past and some were focused on the year ahead. But...

[+] More

 
J Gowdy Consulting - Profitable Sustainable Solutions - © 2010      P.O. Box 128334 Nashville, TN 37212      info@jgowdyconsulting.com      Site design by: iDesign, Inc.